Xneeti Logo
Amazon Agencies

Amazon Aggregators: A Complete Guide For Amazon Sellers

Karan SinghKaran SinghSenior Manager - XneetiSep 18, 202614 min read

Performance Snapshot

✨ Trusted Platform

100+

Managed Brands

Full-service accounts

50%

Avg. YoY growth

Within 6 months

4.5/4.7⭐️

Trustpilot/Google

Verified customer reviews

Built by Experts

Ex-Amazon, Ex-Google

Marketplace insiders

Most guides to Amazon aggregators are still describing 2021. The funding totals, the buyer lists, the multiples they quote. None of it survived 2024.

This covers what aggregators actually do, which ones still write cheques, what your brand is worth now, how offer structure quietly moved risk onto sellers, and what to fix before you take the call.

How this was put together:

  • Buyer status and acquisition criteria checked against current acquirer lists, not recycled from funding-boom coverage
  • Multiples given as ranges by revenue band and channel mix, because a single headline multiple is the most misleading number in this category
  • Deal structure described the way offers are written now, including earnout terms that barely existed four years ago

Disclosure: Xneeti manages Amazon accounts, including brands getting ready to sell. Everything here applies whether you work with us or not.

By the end you will know whether selling makes sense this year, and what your brand would need to fix to attract a serious offer.

What an Amazon aggregator actually is

An aggregator raises institutional money, buys profitable third-party Amazon brands, and runs them together under one operating team. It builds nothing from scratch.

The bet was simple. Buy a brand at three times earnings, run better advertising and tighter sourcing, and the same brand becomes worth more than you paid.

Almost every buyer wants FBA and private label. FBA means Amazon already handles storage, shipping and returns, so the buyer inherits a supply chain that mostly runs itself. Private label means the brand and the supplier relationship transfer with the sale, rather than someone else's wholesale permission that may not survive the handover.

Buyer type

Where they buy

What they want

What it means for you

Aggregator

$1M to $10M revenue

Portfolio fit, operating scale

Fast process, heavier earnout

Private equity

$2M+ EBITDA

Platform or bolt-on asset

Slower, higher multiple, deeper diligence

Strategic buyer

Any size with category fit

Shelf space, supplier, customer base

Best multiple when the fit is real

Individual or SBA buyer

Under $1M

A business to operate themselves

More cash at close, smaller cheque

Worth saying plainly, because the pages ranking for this term blur it. An aggregator is not a broker, not an agency and not a partner. They are buying your business outright.

What happened to the aggregator boom

This section exists because the articles ranking for this keyword quote a market that peaked five years ago, and sellers still walk into calls expecting those numbers.

Then

Now

Roughly 90 to 100 aggregators buying

Fewer than 60 still listed as active, and far fewer closing deals

Thrasio the category leader, over $3B raised

Filed Chapter 11 in February 2024, back smaller and more selective

Perch among the best funded buyers in the space

Absorbed by Razor Group in 2024

80% to 90% of the price paid at closing

60% to 75% at closing on most deals

Diligence done in 30 to 45 days

60 to 90 days standard

4x to 6x SDE common for a clean brand

2.5x to 4x SDE for Amazon-only brands

Cheap debt funding the acquisitions

That debt is what broke the model

The mechanism matters more than the headlines. Aggregators bought on borrowed money at high multiples and assumed pandemic growth rates would hold. Then integration turned out to cost far more attention than anyone had budgeted, growth normalised after 2022, and the cost of the debt behind every purchase went up at the same time.

For sellers the result is fewer buyers, harder diligence, and a smaller share of the price landing on closing day.

Good brands still sell well. The buyers just changed, and more of them now sit outside the aggregator category entirely.

Who is still buying Amazon brands in 2026

Ranking the top five aggregators is close to pointless when the list turns over every few quarters. What lasts is knowing which type of buyer fits a brand your size.

Buyer category

Typical target

What they pay for

Watch for

Surviving large aggregators

$500K+ SDE, multi-ASIN

Category fit, clean account health

Earnout weighting and their own funding position

Boutique and niche acquirers

$250K to $1M SDE

Category expertise, founder handover

Smaller cheques, often better terms

Private equity and holdcos

$2M+ EBITDA

Platform potential, off-Amazon revenue

Long diligence, equity rollover expected

Strategic buyers in your category

Any size with real fit

Supplier access, customers, shelf

Slowest to find, highest multiple

Individual and SBA-financed buyers

Under $1M

A profitable business to run

Financing contingency, deals can collapse late

Razor Group is the largest remaining buyer after absorbing Perch. Thrasio, SellerX, Berlin Brands Group and Essor are still acquiring, though selectively and inside specific categories.

Here is the part most sellers miss. An aggregator is now one bidder, not the market. In plenty of categories a strategic buyer will pay more for the same brand.

Three questions before you talk terms with any of them:

  • When did you last close a deal, and how many have you completed in the past twelve months?
  • What share of your earnouts have paid out in full, and can I speak to a founder you acquired?
  • How is the acquisition funded, because an unpaid earnout from a distressed buyer is a real outcome and not a hypothetical one

What your Amazon brand is actually worth

Every offer rests on one of two earnings figures. Comparing a multiple on one against a multiple on the other is the fastest way to misread an offer, and sellers do it constantly.

Metric

What it includes

Usually used when

SDE

Net profit plus the owner's salary, benefits and one-off costs

Revenue under roughly $5M, owner-operated

EBITDA

Profit before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation, with a market-rate manager costed in

Larger brands, private equity and strategic buyers

SDE is the bigger number. So a 3x SDE offer and a 3x EBITDA offer are not the same offer, and the second one is usually worth more.

Brand profile

Typical range

Under $1M revenue, Amazon only

0.5x to 1.5x revenue, or a low SDE multiple

$1M to $5M revenue, Amazon only

2.5x to 4x SDE

$1M to $3M revenue, diversified channels

4x to 6x SDE

$2M+ EBITDA, clean books, multi-channel

4x to 7x EBITDA

Look at the two middle rows. That is the same profit priced differently, and the only variable is channel mix. Revenue that survives an Amazon suspension is worth more than revenue that does not, and every buyer prices that gap whether they say so or not.

What moves your multiple up:

  • Twenty-four months of stable or growing sales, with no pandemic-era peak the brand never got back to
  • Profit spread across three to five SKUs, since single-ASIN concentration gets discounted hard by every buyer type
  • Margins above 20%, because 15% is treated as the floor rather than a good number
  • A registered trademark, Brand Registry, and an account with no suspensions, IP complaints or review manipulation history
  • Supplier diversity and documented tariff exposure, now a standard diligence question rather than a footnote

Treat ranges as a starting point, not a quote. Category, growth direction and deal structure move the final number more than the headline multiple does.

How the deal is structured, and where the risk sits

The multiple gets all the attention. The structure decides what reaches your bank account, and the two have drifted a long way apart since 2021.

Component

What it means

What to check

Cash at closing

Paid on completion, not conditional

The only part you can treat as certain

Earnout

Paid if the brand hits targets after the sale

Who controls the levers that decide those targets

Stability payment

Paid if performance simply holds

Easier to earn than a growth earnout

Inventory payment

Paid for stock on hand at transfer

Whether it is at cost, and when it lands

Holdback or escrow

Withheld against warranty claims

Release date and what can be clawed back

Equity rollover

You keep a stake in the acquiring entity

Liquidity, dilution, and their funding position

The structural problem with earnouts is one no competing page says out loud. An earnout pays on performance you no longer control. After closing, the buyer sets the advertising budget, the price and the reorder timing, and each of those moves your final payment without anybody acting in bad faith.

Negotiate minimum advertising spend, inventory commitments and pricing floors into the agreement, not into the conversation.

An earnout is also a bet on the buyer still being solvent in two years. Recent history says that is not automatic.

Compare offers on cash at closing first, then on the realistic earnout rather than the maximum one. A lower headline number with more certainty behind it often pays more in the end.

The acquisition process, step by step

Expect sixty to ninety days from signed letter of intent to funds in your account, and longer with a private equity buyer.

Stage

Typical duration

What decides whether you move on

First contact and NDA

Days

Whether your revenue and margin clear their floor

Preliminary review

1 to 2 weeks

Sales stability, SKU concentration, account health

Offer and term sheet

1 to 2 weeks

Your numbers being clean enough to defend

Letter of intent signed

Immediate

Exclusivity begins, other conversations stop

Financial and legal diligence

4 to 8 weeks

Bookkeeping quality, trademark, supplier contracts

Closing and transfer

1 to 2 weeks

Seller Central transfer, inventory count, payment

Transition and handover

30 to 90 days

Documentation, supplier introductions, tribal knowledge

Diligence goes deeper into advertising than most sellers expect. Buyers ask for twenty-four months of campaign-level history, placement and search term reports, and the spend behind every ranking SKU. If you have never pulled those exports yourself, our walkthrough of the Amazon Ads Dashboard covers where they sit in the console.

Exclusivity is the moment your leverage disappears, and two of the three articles ranking for this term barely mention it. Signing the letter of intent usually means you stop talking to other buyers while this one spends two months deciding. They can still walk away at the end of it.

So run your competitive process before the letter of intent. After it, you have one buyer and they know it.

Expect an attempt to renegotiate during diligence. Clean books are the only real defence against a reduced offer at week seven.

Going direct, using a broker, or running a process

Three routes exist. The right one depends less on the fee than on whether you can create genuine competition for your brand.

Route

What it costs

Works best when

Direct to one buyer

No fee, lowest leverage

You know the buyer, the fit is obvious, speed matters most

Broker or marketplace

Typically a success fee

You want multiple bidders and your financials are clean

M&A advisor running a process

Higher fee, retainer common

$2M+ EBITDA, strategic buyers in play

Competition is the actual variable. An unsolicited offer with a three-day deadline is a negotiating structure, not a compliment. Without a second bidder in the room you have no way of knowing what the number should have been, and the buyer is counting on that.

Direct deals are not always worse. They close faster, and on a small deal a saved fee is real money.

How to prepare your brand in the twelve months before you sell

You cannot control the multiple environment. You can control what you hand a buyer, and that decides which end of the range you land in.

Area

What buyers look for

Effect on the offer

Bookkeeping

Accrual P&L, SKU-level margin, no personal spend mixed in

Fastest diligence, hardest to retrade

Profit margin

Above 20%, trending up

Moves both the earnings figure and the multiple

Advertising efficiency

Falling TACoS with rank held or growing

Signals headroom rather than bought-in growth

SKU mix

Three to five SKUs carrying profit, dead SKUs retired

Removes the concentration discount

Account health

No suspensions, IP complaints or policy strikes

Removes the risk that kills deals late

Owner dependence

Documented processes, team or agency in place

Turnkey businesses price higher

Channel mix

Real revenue off Amazon

The single largest multiple lever

Advertising is the least understood item on that list. A buyer reads your ad spend the same way they read your margin. Profit propped up by heavy spend to hold rank gets discounted, because the headroom they are paying for has already been spent. Our Amazon PPC Ads guide covers the campaign structure side, and if you want to sanity-check whether your spend is high for the category, the breakdown of Amazon Ads Cost has current CPC and budget benchmarks.

The flip side is worth more than most sellers realise. Untouched growth levers are part of what a buyer is paying for, and a brand that has never run video or never tested the full Amazon Sponsored Ads range still has obvious upside on the table. Our guides to Amazon Video Ads and Amazon Ads for Scaling Brands cover the two levers buyers most often name in diligence.

Owner dependence is the quiet one. If every bid change and reorder decision runs through you, the buyer is acquiring a job. Documented processes, a team, an agency, or Amazon Ads Software doing the daily work all move the brand closer to turnkey, and turnkey prices higher.

Twelve months is the useful window. Buyers look at trailing twelve-month performance, so a change made in month ten barely registers in the numbers they underwrite.

Every item on that list also makes the business better to own. Preparing to sell and then deciding not to is a perfectly reasonable outcome.

When selling to an aggregator is the wrong move

Sometimes the right answer is not to sell. No page competing for this keyword will tell you that, because most of them are written by people who make money when you do.

Situation

Reasonable read

Margins under 15% and falling

Fix the margin first. The offer will be low and heavily structured

Revenue concentrated in one ASIN

Expect a discount. Launching two more SKUs may pay better than selling

Strong growth, healthy margin, owner burnt out

Hire or outsource operations before you sell the asset

Category fit with a strategic buyer

Do not sell to an aggregator without testing that buyer first

Pandemic peak the brand never recovered to

Buyers price the current run rate, not the peak

Clean, growing, diversified, and you are ready

Run a competitive process now

Burnout drives more exits than valuation does, and it is the worst reason to accept a low offer. Being tired of Seller Central is an operating problem, not a valuation event. Sellers who sell at the bottom of the range usually do it because they wanted the work to stop, not because the price was right.

If the brand is sound and the exhaustion is with the daily work, the question is who runs it rather than who buys it. Our comparison of Amazon Ads Management Services and the shortlist of Amazon Product Ads Management Companies are both reasonable places to start that search.

How Xneeti helps you exit at a higher multiple

The items that move a multiple are margin, advertising efficiency, rank stability and inventory reliability. Those are the same items Xneeti works on every hour the account is live.

Bids adjusted by hour, day and placement against your own conversion patterns. N-gram analysis pulling wasted spend out of search terms before it shows up in an ACoS report. A reorder flagged against supplier lead time before the stockout, not after it. Listings updated for A10 and for Rufus, which now decides what a growing share of shoppers even see.

Across managed accounts that has averaged a 50% reduction in TACoS and 30% revenue growth. Falling TACoS with rank intact is exactly the pattern diligence rewards.

Every account also gets a dedicated strategist who owns it and reviews what the AI does. Amazon Ads Verified Partner and Amazon SPN Partner, built by ex-Amazon and ex-Google teams, managing 80+ accounts.

If you are twelve months out from an exit, the work starts now. Book a demo and we will show you what your advertising and inventory data looks like to a buyer.

Karan Singh

Karan Singh

Senior Manager - Xneeti

Karan Singh is a Certified Amazon Ads specialist with over 6 years of experience helping brands scale on the world's largest marketplace. Working as part of a leading tech company - Xneeti, he is dedicated towards driving measurable growth for brands on Amazon using data and AI. He has helped a diverse mix of clients from small businesses to large enterprises & scale their revenue, improve ROAS, and successfully launch new products in crowded categories.

Related articles

Ready to Scale Your Marketplace Growth?

Join growth-focused brands using Xneeti OneOS to automate ad execution, optimize content, and improve profitability.

Book a Demo

Trusted by leading brands

Rain Guard
EDS Parts
Grip Clean
Armor Concepts
OffGrid
Cosmedica